Although the Tet System in its original version has been and still is in
wide use, a number of modifications and refinements have significantly improved
its applicability [3]. These modifications concern the tTA/rtTA responsive
promoters, Ptet, as well as the transcription activators tTA and rtTA. In
addition, a new class of components has been developed: the tetracycline
controlled transcriptional silencers, tTS.
1. Ptet Derivatives
2. Novel Transactivators
3. Transcriptional Silencers
4. Viral and Episomal Vectors
5. Tet control in Whole Organisms
6. List of Tet Components
Ptet-bi is a bidirectional tTA/rtTA responsive promoter [4] where the heptamerized tetO sequences are flanked by two minimal promoters, thus allowing the coregulation of two genes transcribed in opposite directions (Fig. 2) . This promoter has proven particularly useful for monitoring gene activities that cannot be readily assayed. Coregulation of a target gene with a gene encoding an appropriate reporter function, thus, provides an assayable correlate. Likewise, Ptet-bi allows the control of the synthesis for two gene products that may form heterodimers. Finally, by fusing different minimal promoters to the tetO heptamer, two gene products may be synthesized at different but defined levels. Ptet-bi constructs are particularly useful in the generation of transgenic mouse lines, where for example the monitoring of Tet-dependent luciferase activities greatly facilitates the identification of founder lines with the expected regulation pattern.
Ptet-14 is a sequence variant of the original Ptet-1. Accordingly, Ptet-14 differs from Ptet-1 in the spacer sequence between the tetO elements which was shortened by 5 bp and redesigned to eliminate potential binding sites for endogenous mammalian transcription factors to the Ptet promoter region. Furthermore the CMV promoter part was reduced and now comprises CMV sequences from position -53 to +12 (Fig. 2) Remarkably, this promoter shows a significantly reduced background activity when used under transient expression conditions.
tTA2-syn series. For a number of reasons, it appeared advantageous to replace
the original VP16 transcription activation domain of 127 amino acids by so-called „acid
domains“ of only 13 amino acids (Fig. 3) . This resulted in a set of
transactivators that exhibit a graded activation potential depending on the
number and sequence of the „acid domains“ [5] .
tTA2 corresponds in its activation potential to the original tTA. The coding
sequence of tTA2 was redesigned reconciling a number of parameters for optimal
expression in higher eukaryotes. The resulting tTA2-syn transactivator is
produced in HeLa cells in improved yields and stability [6] .
rtTA2-syn series. Despite its wide and successful application, the original
rtTA exhibits some limitations. It is fully activated only at relatively
high Dox concentrations (1-2 µg/ml), which may be difficult to reach
in some compartments of the mouse. Moreover, rtTA showed a low but distinct
residual affinity to tetO, an issue in situations of transient expression
and in episomal approaches.
Using genetic strategies, a series of novel rtTAs was identified, one of
which exhibited highly improved properties. The respective mutant TetR-M2
was fused to three minimal activation domains and the coding sequence was
redesigned following the rules applied to the tTA2-syn gene. The resulting
rtTA2-syn1(Fig.
3) (published in [6] as
rtTA2S-M2) exhibits a hardly measurable
residual affinity to tetO and is fully induced at Dox concentrations
as low as 80 ng/ml.
tTS, tetracycline controlled transcriptional silencers are fusions between TetR and transcriptional silencing domains [7] . They were developed to shield the minimal promoter within Ptet from nearby transcriptional enhancers, which may cause a Tet-independent background activity often referred to as „leakiness“. tTSKid is a fusion between TetR and the 62 amino acid KRAB silencing domain of the human gene kid-1. It has a modified TetR domain which prevents heterodimerization when used in combination with rtTA, as shown in Fig. 4 . The tetracycline dependent repression-activation principle as outlined in Fig. 4 is particularly useful for tightly controlling Ptet-driven transcription units that cannot be sufficiently insulated from neighbouring enhancers. Such situations are frequently encountered with viral and particularly episomal vectors. tTSKid or similar TetR based silencer proteins may also be used for the doxycycline dependent control of other promoter/tetO combinations recognized by RNA polymerase II, III or I.
Viral and Episomal Vectors
To combine inducible expression with virally mediated gene transfer the
Tet Technology was integrated into a variety of viral vectors derived from
retroviruses, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses (AAV), Herpes simplex
virus (HSV) and lentiviruses. These vectors allow fast and efficient transfer
of the Tet System into tissue culture cells and animals. More importantly,
regulated gene expression and efficient transfer are essential prerequisites
for successful gene therapy. Here, inducibility of gene expression appears
mandatory, not only for therapeutic fine tuning of the gene product to
be delivered, but also for safety reasons.
As in the plasmid-borne system, approaches used for development of viral
vectors can be divided into “one-virus” and “two-virus“ strategies.
When one considers potential problems of cotransduction it appears advantageous
to incorporate the transactivator gene and the response unit in a single
vector. On the other hand, close proximity of the promoter driving transactivator
expression and Ptet may lead to interference, potentially resulting
in a less stringent regulation.
As for viral vectors, crosstalk between the regulatory elements of the Tet System is a concern whenever the components of the system are incorporated into a single episomal vector. The strategies to overcome such potential limitations are the same as discussed for viral vectors. However, it has been shown that, given appropriate design of the vectors, such systems can function efficiently even without the incorporation of insulator sequences or silencer proteins. Such vectors, especially those based on the Epstein-Barr-Virus (EBV) replicon have considerable potential for speeding up the establishment of the Tet System in cultured cells, whenever chromosomal integration of the regulatory system is not required.
Tet control in Whole Organisms
The general applicability of Tet regulation is most impressively
demonstrated by the broad spectrum of transgenic organisms into which
Tet control has been transferred. They include |
|
| • | unicellular organisms such as S. cerevisiae, Dictiostelium,
Apicomplexa like Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium falciparum; |
| • | insects such as Drosophila melanogaster and Anopheles
gambiae; |
| • | plants such as Arabidopsis, tobacco and moss; |
| • | zebrafish (Danio rerio) |
| • | amphibians such as Xenopus laevis; |
| • | mammals, particularly mice and rats. |
In addition, Tet regulation has been successfully transferred to mice, rats and non-human primates via viral vectors, naked DNA or cell transplants.
Most remarkable results have been obtained in transgenic mice, where the
potential to control individual gene activities in a temporally defined and
cell type restricted manner has allowed the in vivo dissection of gene functions
and pathways with unprecedented precision, providing new insights into such
fundamental biological processes as development, behaviour and disease [8,9] .
For biomedical research, the ability to quantitatively and reversibly control
disease genes has opened up new perspectives for modelling human diseases.
Numerous disease models have, in the meantime, been described that permit
the study not only of the onset of a disease, but also its progression, its
potential reversibility and regression.
Needless to say, such models will more faithfully mimic pathologies and will
thus enhance our understanding of diseases at the molecular and physiological
level, thereby facilitating the development of new strategies for intervention
and prevention.
The Tet Technology holds an unique position as the standard for transcriptionally regulated transgenic mouse models, unchallenged by any of the alternative technical approaches developed in the past decades for inducible regulation in tissue culture.
More than 80 mouse lines have been described expressing the tTA/rtTA genes under the control of a variety of tissue specific promoters, and around 100 mouse lines were published containing various target genes under Ptet control. Obviously, the combinatorial potential of this quickly expanding „zoo“ is only beginning to be exploited.
All plasmids, viruses and cell lines that use Tet Technology are available through BD Biosciences Clontech (http://www.clontech.com/clontech/tet/index.shtml). The following table lists only those reagents that were originally transferred from the Bujard laboratory to Clontech. For a complete listing of all available Tet reagents and, in particular, the wide range of Tet System responsive cell lines available, please visit: (http://www.clontech.com/clontech/products/literature/pdf/productlists/tetprodlist.pdf)
Nomenclature of plasmids generated by the Bujard laboratory
that can be obtained from BD Biosciences Clontech
| Tet System Components | ||||
| Tet Component / encoding Plasmid as published |
Nomenclature of Tet Component by TET Systems |
BD Clontech Plasmid Designation | Remarks | |
| |
tTA / pUHD 15-1neo [1] | tTA |
pTet-Off | expression vector for tTA |
| rtTA / pUHD 17-1neo [2] | rtTA | pTet-On | expression vector for rtTA | |
| tTA2 / pUHD 20-1 [3] | tTA2 | ptTA2 | expression vector for tTA with minimal domains | |
| tTA3 / pUHD 19-1 [3] | tTA3 | ptTA3 | expression vector for tTA with minimal domains | |
| tTA4 / pUHD 26-1 [3] | tTA4 | ptTA4 | expression vector for tTA with minimal domains | |
| tTA2S / pUHT 61-1 [4] | tTA2-syn | will be available soon | expression vector for a synthetic, improved tTA | |
| rtTA2S-M2 / pUHrT 62-1 [4] | rtTA2-syn1 | will be available soon | expression vector for a synthetic, improved rtTA | |
| tTS Kid / pUHS 6-1 [5] | tTS Kid | pTet-tTS | expression vector for tTS | |
| PhCMV*-1 / pUHD 10-3 [1] | Ptet-1 | pTRE | cloning vector for genes of interest | |
| Pbi-1 / pBI-1 [6] | Ptet-bi | pBI-GL | bidirectional cloning vector controlling lacZ and luciferase | |
| Pbi-1 / pBI-3 [6] | Ptet-bi | pBI-G | bidirectional cloning vector controlling lacZ and gene of interest | |
| Pbi-1 / pBI-4 [6] | Ptet-bi | pBI | bidirectional cloning vector controlling two genes of interest | |
| Pbi-1 / pBI-5 [6] | Ptet-bi | pBI-L | bidirectional cloning vector controlling luciferase and gene of interest | |
| Ptet-14 / pUHC 13-3-1* [unpublished] | Ptet-14 | pTRE-Tight | modified cloning vector for genes of interest | |
| PhCMV*-1 / pUHC 13-3 [7] | Ptet-1 | pTRE-luc | control vector for luciferase under tTA/rtTA control | |
| PtetO-13 / pUHC 13-13 [5] | PtetO-13 | ptTS-Control | control vector for luciferase under tTS control | |
Antibodies
Polyclonal sera and monoclonal antibodies against TetR, which therefore recognize
all of the transactivator variants listed above, are available from MoBiTec
(http://www.mobitec.de/int/products/bio/05_antibodies/index.php?anti_tet.html).